(DCNF)—Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley deserves applause for recently advancing his congressional stock trading ban from committee to the full Senate.
Notably, every Democrat on the committee voted in favor of the bill.
It’s obvious why we need this law; it would ban members of Congress, future presidents, and vice presidents, as well as their spouses, from trading or holding individual stocks while they’re in office.
We’ve all seen reports of lawmakers who vastly increase their wealth while in office, while making just $174,000 a year. But we all know who the number one offender is: former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Her household’s net worth reportedly exceeds $400 million, roughly equivalent to saving every penny of her salary since the year Alexander the Great died.
As recently as last July, her husband, Paul, sold at least $500,000 worth of Visa stock. His timing was impeccable. Paul Pelosi offloaded his shares just three weeks before Biden’s Department of Justice sued the company for allegedly monopolizing debit transactions.
The lawsuit itself was bogus and unnecessary as Visa does not have a monopoly. Consumers have numerous ways to pay for things; they do not have to use Visa. But while investors lost $30 billion when news of the lawsuit broke, well-connected individuals like Pelosi managed to save face.
So, how did Paul know when to sell his shares? Good question. There’s no clear answer, but there’s a reason Hawley originally called his bill the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act.
Unfortunately, despite the apparent risks of allowing lawmakers with insider knowledge to buy and sell stocks, and despite the ineffectiveness of existing disclosure requirements, some have lined up to attack Hawley’s bill.
One critic suggested that Hawley’s populism had crossed the line into a Bernie Sanders-style vilification of wealth.
“He made a reference to billionaires, okay?” Florida Sen. Rick Scott said. “I don’t know when in this country it became a negative to make money. But somehow, if you’ve made money, you’re supposedly — I think Senator Hawley suggests — you shouldn’t be serving, because you might trade stocks.”
Another senator critical of Hawley’s bill, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, said the ban would “dissuade the exact kind of people you want serving in government — people who know the private sector, understand how harmful government is to it.”
While their criticisms are misplaced, the principled objections they raise are worth considering.
James Madison made it clear that there would be no “qualification of wealth” for office. Still, he acknowledged that Congress would likely attract ambitious, talented, locally prominent men “fit to comprehend and pursue great and national objects.” These qualities correlate strongly with wealth.
As governor of Virginia, Thomas Jefferson pushed for education and property reforms to ensure that both wealth and political power accrued in the hands of what he called a “natural aristocracy” of the talented and the virtuous.
So, yes, wealthy Americans often make great leaders and lawmakers. Just look at President Trump, whose net worth exceeds that of all previous presidents combined.
That said, Madison also called on his countrymen to elect “representatives whose enlightened views and virtuous sentiments render them superior to local prejudices and schemes of injustice.”
Trading individual stocks will always put the lawmaker’s individual interest in conflict with the common good and lead to the “schemes of injustice” Madison warned us about.
And honestly, not trading individual stocks isn’t a huge ask. Perhaps a one-term congressman who trades stocks and picks up tips at classified briefings could turn $10 million into $20 million during their term. Alternatively, he could invest the money in two-year Treasury notes and net around $750,000 by the time his term ends.
A 7.5% rate of return isn’t great compared to the alternative, but it’s not like we’re asking these guys to freeze their toes off at Valley Forge.
Anyone who shows up to Congress expecting to get substantially wealthier while in office is there for the wrong reasons. Public service should require sacrifice.
Haley Kennington (@LadyKennington) is an investigative journalist and conservative commentator. She served as the Research Director & Story Editor for “2020:The Plot Against the President” and Research/Archive Editor for “What Is a Woman?“
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
