(The Epoch Times)—An estimated 21.8 million senior citizens in America make ends meet solely using their social security funds, The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) said in a June 20 statement.
There are more than 68 million Social Security beneficiaries as of 2024, according to data from the Social Security Administration (SSA).
“Almost two-thirds of seniors who completed the survey said they were dissatisfied with the amount they receive from their monthly Social Security checks,” said the TSCL statement.
Ninety-four percent said the 2025 COLA of 2.5 percent was too low, and their benefits did not keep pace with economic inflation. COLA is an annual adjustment to social security payments made to ensure that benefits keep pace with inflation. The SSA announces the COLA in October every year, which is implemented in the following year.
Moreover, many believe that last year’s actual inflation was considerably higher than the government’s estimate. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates 2024 inflation to be 2.9 percent.
Nearly all, or 95 percent, said that reforming Social Security and Medicare should be taken as a top priority by the federal administration and Congress. A majority were in favor of “calculating the COLA with an inflation index that better represents seniors’ economic experiences.”
The January to March 2025 survey was conducted among 3,050 American seniors over the age of 62 who were eligible for their Social Security benefits. Out of those who took the survey, 1,920 provided enough data to use in the study.
According to the survey report, the median U.S. senior lives on $1,000-$2,000 a month. This includes 13 percent of seniors living on less than $1,000 a month.
“TSCL estimates that approximately 7.3 million American seniors survive on less than $1,000 a month, which would put them below $15,650 for the year, the 2025 Federal poverty line for a household of one. TSCL also estimates that another 24.5 million survive on between $1,000 and $2,000,” said the report.
“This is especially challenging for seniors who rent, like 36 percent of those who participated in this study. The average U.S. rent for a one-bedroom apartment is $1,327 as of May 2025.”
Nearly 40 percent of seniors were found to be dependent on social security “for the entirety of their income.” Around 73 percent depend on these benefits for over half their income.
“Seniors who live on only Social Security are much more likely to live on extremely meager incomes. In total, 20 percent of seniors who depend on Social Security for 100 percent of their income live on $1,000 or less per month, compared to 13 percent of seniors overall,” said the report.
The survey found that many seniors claimed their benefits early at the cost of penalties.
People who wait for retirement, 66-67 years of age, get benefits based on their historical earnings. However, those who start claiming benefits as early as 62 years of age will suffer a permanent reduction in monthly receipts of up to 30 percent.
“About 68 percent of seniors start claiming their Social Security benefits before retirement age. A plurality, 42 percent, claim their benefits as soon as they are eligible in exchange for a 30 percent reduction,” according to the report.
The biggest reason seniors choose to claim their benefits early is financial pressure, said the report.
A third of the respondents reported taking benefits early because they were unable to meet living expenses, such as groceries or rent, without these benefits. In addition, 22 percent took benefits early to handle a medical emergency or deal with a medical issue.
Calculation Reforms
Most survey participants advocated for reforms in COLA calculation, with the popular opinion being to use an inflation index representing their economic experiences rather than solely relying on urban wages.
At present, COLA is calculated using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners. TSCL advocated switching the COLA calculation to the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly.
“The data in this study shows what seniors have been telling TSCL for years: Social Security checks aren’t keeping up with inflation,” said TSCL executive director Shannon Benton.
“If four in five seniors think inflation was higher than the government reported in 2024, maybe we should stop questioning their experiences and start questioning why the COLA is failing to measure them.”
Benton warned against any move to cut Social Security. Given that it makes up at least half the incomes earned by almost three-quarters of seniors, cuts to the program would “push millions of hard-working Americans further into poverty, robbing them of their right to retire with dignity.”
According to data from the SSA, before 2020, the last time there was a COLA adjustment of 5 percent or more was in 2008 when COLA was 5.8 percent. Post 2020, COLAs of 5.9 and 8.7 percent were implemented in 2021 and 2022, respectively.
In 2023, COLA dropped to 3.2 percent, moving down to 2.5 percent in 2024, with the same rate implemented this year as well.
In a June 11 statement, TSCL predicted COLA for 2026 to be 2.5 percent.
If inflation were to rise in any significant manner over the coming months, for instance, due to the tariff policies being followed by the current Trump administration, COLA for next year could be pushed up as well.
$2,000 Checks, Fund Depletion
The TSCL survey comes at a time when the average social security payment for retired workers has hit $2,000 per month for the first time ever. According to SSA data, the average monthly payment stood at $2,002.39 in May, up 4.5 percent from a year ago. Retired workers make up 75 percent of Social Security beneficiaries.
The average benefit for all individuals, including retired and non-retired individuals, was $1,857.75 last month.
Meanwhile, social security funds are at risk of being depleted earlier than expected.
The 2025 OASDI trustees report, published on June 18, revealed that the cost of the social security program started exceeding its income in 2021. The funds are expected to be depleted by 2034, one year earlier than last year’s projections.
Post this date, SSA will only be able to pay beneficiaries 81 percent of the scheduled benefits.
“The Trustees recommend that lawmakers address the projected trust fund shortfalls in a timely way in order to phase in necessary changes gradually and give workers and beneficiaries time to adjust,” the report said.
“Implementing changes sooner rather than later would allow more generations to share in the needed revenue increases or reductions in scheduled benefits.”
In February, a group of lawmakers introduced the Social Security Expansion Act to tackle the issue, according to a Feb. 7 statement from the office of Rep. Val Hoyle (D-Ore.).
The legislation seeks to ensure that social security remains fully funded for the next 75 years by applying the social security payroll tax to all annual incomes higher than $250,000. The bill also aims to boost benefits by $2,400 per year.
- Hand-curated links from conservative and Christian sites — NO legacy media garbage links. Patriots get their news every day at JDRucker.com
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
