(DCNF)—Well, isn’t this convenient? The Climate Judiciary Project (CJP), an organization launched by the left-wing Environmental Law Institute to “train” America’s judges in the dark art of climate alarmism – has quietly swept its tracks.
Where judges’ names were once found blithely endorsing CJP’s curriculum, now we find anonymous “participating judges” and sterilized public pages. The shame is palpable. If there’s any good news, it’s that CJP is finally embarrassed about its not-so-secret effort to brainwash the bench with climate junk science. The bad news is that the indoctrination marches on, just a little better disguised.
CJP’s entire strategy has been to infiltrate the judiciary with one-sided climate hysteria, dressing up advocacy as “neutral, objective education.” They’ve marshaled millions in funding from anti-energy foundations to host seminars, boot camps, and a listserv where at least 2,000 judges have, at last count, been treated to modules straight from climate activists’ playbooks.
Then, there’s the hypocrisy. The Left petulantly demands more transparency for Supreme Court justices – who, thanks to lifetime tenure, are beyond direct influence – yet remains curiously quiet about CJP’s efforts among state judges, many of whom serve in time-limited or elected roles and, let’s be blunt, are far more vulnerable to activist grooming.
Archived chats pulled back the curtain on judges and CJP bureaucrats trading climate studies, congratulating each other for activist events, and sharing litigation updates with a wink and a nudge. Delaware Judge Travis Laster wasn’t just sending peer-reviewed science, he was distributing hush-hush YouTube presentations forecasting industry bankruptcy with the caveat, “don’t forward or use without checking with me.” This is not impartial education; this is prepping the bench for lawfare against the energy sector.
Indiana’s Judge Stephen Scheele, whose glowing review of the CJP once topped their testimonial page, now claims amnesia. No “substantive communication,” he says, though the records reveal otherwise. Embarrassment breeds revisionist history – the tell-tale sign of an operation caught red-handed. Even the CJP’s own curriculum is a master class in loaded messaging, pedaling wind and solar as the “cheapest” energy, evangelizing the pseudo-religion of “climate justice,” and treating attribution science (a field riddled with criticism) as settled fact. Dissent? Never heard of her.
Meanwhile, the group refuses to disclose which judges have been “trained.” That’s because they well know that an adversarial lawyer, if not the public, might want to know if their judge has been subtly instructed to see energy producers as climate villains. The Judicial Leaders in Climate Science program has now been scrubbed from view; the CJP forum is a graveyard of broken links. All this selective transparency serves to hide, not halt, the effort to tip the legal scales.
The greatest challenge now falls to the defense bar. How can it be ascertained whether or not a judge sitting on a blockbuster climate case has spent a year marinating in activist climate dogma behind closed doors? Judicial disclosure ought to be mandatory and recusals should be vigorously pursued. If plaintiffs and their deep-pocketed allies are bringing energy companies to the dock, the least the bench can do is profess its ideological immunization – on the record.
Let’s not pretend this is normal. When the Federalist Society hosts a legal conference, for example, leftists call for judicial bans and ethical investigations. But when the Environmental Law Institute trains judges – in partnership with the Federal Judicial Center, no less – on climate litigation sympathetic to the green agenda, it’s called “objectivity.” The Wall Street Journal nailed it: it’s a double standard, and it’s rotten.
Immediate steps need to be taken to end activist intrusion into America’s courtrooms. Congress should demand an end to any collaboration between the Federal Judicial Center and the Climate Judiciary Project, and clarify the vetting of all outside partnerships. Opponents of President Biden’s failed Supreme Court overhaul should redirect their attention toward the bona fide ethics crisis brewing in state and lower federal courts. State officials must bar the Environmental Law Institute and its affiliates from using taxpayer-funded facilities and law schools for ideological boot camps. If you care about judicial integrity, now’s the time to shout it from the rooftops; silence is compliance.
The CJP may be embarrassed, but it’s not stopping. If the courts are to survive this activist incursion, it will only be because the defendants, attorneys, and lawmakers recognize what’s happening and fight back with every ounce of transparency, scrutiny, and legal fortitude they can muster. Otherwise, we’ll all pay at the pump, in the courts, and in the loss of an independent judiciary.
Steve Milloy is a biostatistician and lawyer, publishes JunkScience.com and is on X @JunkScience.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
