(Substack)—Underscoring the escalating energy demands of artificial intelligence, a massive new data center is set to rise near Cheyenne, Wyoming. This joint project between energy infrastructure firm Tallgrass and AI data center developer Crusoe promises to harness the state’s abundant natural resources while pushing the boundaries of power consumption.
At its initial phase, the facility is projected to devour 15.8 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity annually—more than five times the amount used by all of Wyoming’s roughly 590,000 residents combined. When fully scaled to 10 gigawatts (GW), it could consume a staggering 87.6 TWh per year, doubling the state’s entire current electricity generation of about 43 TWh.
The data center, located several miles south of Cheyenne near the Colorado border off U.S. Route 85, represents a significant shift for Wyoming, a state long known for exporting energy rather than consuming it locally. Wyoming produces approximately 12 times more energy than it uses, with nearly three-fifths of its electricity sent to other states. The state’s total electricity consumption hovers around 17 TWh annually, with residential users accounting for just over 3 TWh, commercial sectors about 3.6 TWh, and industrial users dominating at nearly 10 TWh. This new facility’s initial draw alone would represent 91% of Wyoming’s current total consumption across all sectors, highlighting the immense scale of AI-driven infrastructure.
To meet these unprecedented demands without straining the public grid, the project will rely on dedicated on-site generation from natural gas and renewable sources. Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon has hailed the initiative as “exciting news” for the state’s natural gas producers, potentially revitalizing an industry that has faced challenges from shifting energy markets. Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins echoes this optimism, anticipating a swift start to construction pending state and local regulatory approvals.
Speculation surrounds the data center’s potential tenants, with whispers linking it to OpenAI’s ambitious Stargate project—a multi-trillion-dollar endeavor to build supercomputers capable of powering advanced AI models. Crusoe, which recently activated a gigawatt-scale facility in Abilene, Texas, in partnership with Oracle for OpenAI, has neither confirmed nor denied involvement in Wyoming. OpenAI has publicly scouted locations across 16 states for expansion but has not explicitly named Wyoming, leaving room for intrigue.
This development is part of a broader trend where AI data centers are reshaping energy landscapes nationwide. Wyoming already hosts facilities from tech giants like Microsoft and Meta, drawn by the state’s cool climate and affordable power. However, the surge in demand raises concerns: the International Energy Agency forecasts that data centers’ electricity and water use could double by 2030, fueled largely by AI. In Wyoming, critics worry about potential hikes in electricity bills for everyday consumers as infrastructure strains to keep pace. Nationally, electricity demand growth has accelerated from 2.6% to 4.7% over the next five years, partly due to data centers.
Yet, proponents argue the benefits outweigh the risks. By creating local demand for Wyoming’s fossil fuels and renewables, the data center could bolster economic growth in a state where energy production is a cornerstone. As AI continues to evolve, projects like this one signal a new era where technology’s hunger for power could transform energy-exporting states into hubs of digital innovation.
Wyoming’s proposed AI data center isn’t just a facility—it’s a harbinger of the energy-intensive future of computing. With consumption figures that dwarf residential needs and potential ties to cutting-edge AI, it positions the Equality State at the forefront of a global tech-energy nexus.
JD’s manually curated links for God-fearing MAGA patriots
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
