(The Daily Signal)—School discipline based on traditional notions of justice and common sense is increasingly returning to classrooms thanks to the Trump administration.
In April, President Donald Trump signed an executive order, “Reinstating Common Sense School Discipline Policies.”
The order’s purpose was to ensure that the “Federal Government will no longer tolerate known risks to children’s safety and well-being in the classroom that result from the application of school discipline based on discriminatory and unlawful ‘equity’ ideology.”
The order repudiated the Obama administration’s 2014 “Dear Colleague” letter that threatened schools with a Department of Justice investigation if their school discipline policies were found to be discriminatory under a disparate impact analysis.
These were the days before Ibram X. Kendi became the leading antiracism intellectual, but disparate impact essentially follows his rubric for what racism is. Disparate impact analysis considers racial discrepancies in policy outcomes to be evidence of racism regardless of intent.
In the case of schools, if black students were receiving more suspensions than white students, for instance, that could be seen as a violation of civil rights law according to President Barack Obama’s DOJ. The policy was ended by the first Trump administration but brought back under President Joe Biden.
The result under Obama and Biden was a disaster. Schools decided in many cases that disciplining troublemaking students was more trouble than it was worth if the federal government was going to come after them and cut off their funding.
As schools became lax on discipline, academic standards dropped. Teachers felt like they weren’t in control of classrooms. Students were increasingly at risk. Policies based on the Obama-era guidance may have directly contributed to the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida.
The situation was only exacerbated during the era of COVID-19 lockdowns. When students returned to class, discipline had further eroded, and many students slipped further behind. Good teachers quit, students reported feeling unsafe, and academic achievement plummeted.
It seems now that not only has the federal government made a drastic reversal, but momentum to move away from disparate impact analysis and “restorative justice” is increasing in the states.
The Wall Street Journal noted in early July that several states have responded to the Trump executive order—and the perhaps the “vibe shift” on disparate impact and other kinds of counterproductive wokeness—with laws that prioritize school discipline.
As the Journal noted, while school discipline policies are best left as a local matter, the Trump administration policy shift ensures that “schools are free to enact discipline based on behavior, not race.” And that’s clearly what more states are focusing on now.
In May, Texas passed a so-called “Teachers Bill of Rights” that included a law making it easier for teachers and schools to discipline disruptive students.
The law allows teachers to remove disruptive students from classrooms and extends the potential time for suspensions.
The need for increasing discipline was apparent because, according to the Texas Tribune, “more than 3,300 Texas district employees were the target of a student assault in the 2023-24 school year, about a 15% increase from the year before.”
“The main mission of this bill is about protecting the rights and safeguarding and elevating the rights of educators in the classroom to control and crack down on classroom discipline, which is becoming a growing problem across the state in all grades and all schools,” Texas State Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, said according to local ABC affiliate KVUE.
“Arkansas lawmakers in April passed a law that ensures students removed for violent behavior aren’t returned to the same classroom,” the Wall Street Journal reported. “The Legislature also stripped from state law a requirement that districts use ‘positive behavioral support’—which focuses on ‘conflict resolution’ and ‘coping skills’—to address student misbehavior.
West Virginia passed a law in April making it easier to remove violent or threatening students from classrooms. The law provides a framework for schools to assess misbehaving students, put them on behavioral plans, and potentially remove them permanently from classrooms if improvements aren’t made.
While not every state is making this school discipline pivot, the tide seems to have turned—at least for now.
Perhaps the woke, DEI mania of 2020 ended up opening the eyes of many Americans who suffered the consequences of policies based on social justice. Hopefully the seesaw will end and this will be the last we’ve seen of the disastrous Obama-Biden school policies.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
